Friday, February 28, 2025

Gaza – Saturday, March 1, 2025~~?

February 28, 2025

The first phase of the three-phase hostage and ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas ends on Saturday, March 1, 2025. Under the agreement, 602 terrorist prisoners will then be released in exchange for the bodies of four slain Israeli hostages. Of the prisoners to be released, 50 are serving life sentences, many of whom were responsible for orchestrating the horrific suicide bombings of the mid-1990s.

Saturday’s exchange of hostages for terrorists marks the end of the first phase of the agreement. There are no signs from either side of the warring parties or the various mediators that Israel and Hamas are close to reaching an agreement on implementing the second phase of the hostage and ceasefire agreement.

Saturday, March 1, 2025~~?

US Ambassador Steve Witkoff has been trying to broker an extension of the first phase of the ceasefire. Such an extension would specifically include the release of hostages deemed to be in need of immediate medical attention. The remaining hostages are all men under 50, and each would require Israel to pay higher “ransoms” than convicted terrorists to be released. It is unlikely that an extension of the first phase would cover all living hostages, as Hamas can be expected to want to hold some to achieve its larger political goals in the war.

The hardening of attitudes in Israel is also illustrated by the announcement on Thursday, February 27, 2025, by Israeli Energy Minister Eli Cohen that Israel will not withdraw from the so-called Philadelphia Corridor in Gaza as required by the ceasefire agreement. He stated that Israeli forces would not withdraw until three key goals were achieved: the full return of prisoners, the removal of Hamas from power, and the complete disarmament of Gaza. Israeli forces also consider their presence in the area essential to prevent weapons smuggling. Israel was expected to begin withdrawing from the Philadelphia Corridor on Saturday, the last day of the first phase of the ceasefire, and to complete the withdrawal within eight days.

Israeli politicians outside the government have presented their own “after-the-day” plans for Gaza. Left-wing leader Yair Golan called for moderate Palestinian forces to control Gaza while preserving the IDF’s freedom of action.

Yair Lapid, the leader of the center-right opposition, presented a plan that called for Egypt to take responsibility for Gaza for 15 years, during which the international community would wipe out Egypt’s $155 billion foreign debt. Lapid explained that Israel cannot accept Hamas remaining in power, the Palestinian Authority (PA) is unable to govern Gaza, the Israeli occupation is undesirable, and the continued chaos poses a serious security threat to Israel. At the same time, Egypt’s economy is on the verge of collapse and threatens the stability of Egypt and the entire Middle East. Lapid said that over the course of 15 years, Gaza would be rebuilt and the conditions for self-rule would be created.

Lapid proposed that the current ceasefire be ended until all hostages are released, with Egypt assuming control of Gaza through a UN Security Council resolution, defined as “custodianship,” with the goal of transferring the Gaza Strip to the PA government after a process of reform and deradicalization, with measurable criteria. At the same time, a reconstruction process would begin under Egyptian supervision, with Saudi Arabia and the Abraham Accords signatories participating in working groups, and the United States investing in Gaza. He also called on Egypt to allow any Gazan who wants to leave and has somewhere to go to do so in a regulated manner.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi is currently (27/02/2025) in Riyadh to discuss an Arab plan for Gaza. Arab states are expected to discuss a post-war reconstruction plan for Gaza, possibly to counter US President Donald Trump’s proposal to redevelop the Strip under US control. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are reviewing the Arab plan in Riyadh before it is presented at a planned Arab summit in Cairo on March 4. The plan for Gaza could include up to $20 billion for reconstruction in the territory. The proposal includes the formation of a Palestinian national committee to govern Gaza without Hamas involvement and international participation in reconstruction without transferring Palestinians abroad. Egypt’s initial proposal is reported to have been a five-year plan for Gaza reconstruction, during which Gazans would be resettled in safe zones inside Gaza.

The EU, a major donor to the Palestinians, presented its position to the Israeli authorities in talks in Brussels on 24 February as part of the EU-Israel Association Council, the first such meeting since 2022. The EU supports the return of Gazans to their homes in Gaza and has pledged to contribute to their reconstruction.

According to Maher al-Namoura, a Fatah spokesman, the Palestinian Authority is capable of governing and rebuilding Gaza. He made his remarks in a recent discussion on the social media of Saudi Arabia’s interactive news channel Al Hadath. This reflects the PA’s policy since 2007 – when Hamas illegally pushed it out of Gaza in 2007 – that it should govern Gaza. Fatah is the largest faction in the PA.

My assessment

My assessment of the implementation of the second phase of the Hamas-Israel agreement, at least in the form previously outlined, is even more pessimistic than before. The reason is the numerous violations of the first agreement and the treatment of the hostages, which shocked the Israelis in particular. Tensions are also increasing due to the bus bombing in the Tel Aviv area a week ago, which, if successful (only two buses exploded at the depot), would have been very devastating. The attack was carried out by West Bank terrorists but Hamas took responsibility for them.

The first shock was the starving appearance of the three released hostages, the second was the inferior carnivalization of the release event by Hamas, the third was the return of the mother, baby and child under 5 years old of the Bibas family in coffins, the fourth was that one body was a completely unknown Arab woman (later corrected to the right person) and the fifth was when it was discovered that a 9-month-old baby and a 4-year-old had been slaughtered by Hamas already in November 2023 (Hamashan claimed that the family died in Israeli airstrikes, so no signs were found in the autopsies).

If no agreement is reached to extend the first phase, Israel is preparing to resume intense fighting with US support. It is hoped that the credibility of this threat will persuade Hamas to extend the agreement.

In the second phase of the ceasefire, the remaining 59 hostages would be released, Israel would withdraw completely from Gaza, and a permanent ceasefire would be established. Of the hostages, 24-27 are believed to still be alive. The current Israeli government does not want to withdraw from Gaza until all hostages are returned, and as long as Hamas poses a military threat to the country,

A renewed outbreak of fighting, should the ceasefire collapse, will occur in a vastly different global strategic environment than the one that prevailed when the war broke out in October 2023. The Iranian “ring of fire” that surrounded Israel in 2023 has broken in Lebanon and Syria (but not in Yemen), while the US administration today no longer places limits on Israeli firepower.

In any case, I assume that in the coming weeks there will be intensive negotiations on extending the first phase of the agreement. During this time, Israel will probably conclude the purge of Hamas terrorist cells in the West Bank, and the moderate Arab countries will present their own post-war plan for Gaza.

Sources include Jerusalem PostBICOM , TheNewArab


Article first published (in Finnish) in Ariel-Israelista suomeksi online publication

Sunday, February 9, 2025

A Game Changer for the Middle East


February 9, 2025

US President Donald Trump’s vision for Gaza has been met with a largely negative reception around the world. The initiative has been described as outrageous, illegal, ethnic cleansing, a violation of international order, forced displacement, impossible to implement, dramatic, shocking, etc. On the other hand, it has been described as “out of the box” thinking, a panacea, a masterstroke, radical, unconventional, etc.

From my perspective, Trump’s vision is a game changer, the cards have now been redistributed, disregarding the traditional rules, resulting in a pragmatic plan that promises a better future and is feasible due to the presenter.

Trump’s vision

President Trump presented his Gaza vision a little over two weeks ago and has since returned to it on two occasions, also presenting clarifications. The main features of the Trump plan’s control elements:

  • After the end of the Gaza war, Israel will hand over the Gaza Strip to US control in terms of Gaza and Hamas; US soldiers would not be needed in Gaza.
  • The United States will “clean up the demolition site”, remove the booby traps and mines laid by Hamas, as well as unexploded ordnance, of which there are estimated to be around 30,000 in Gaza.
  • The cleanup and The reconstruction of the areas in question, either selectively or by transferring Gazans elsewhere, either to the Gaza security zones or to areas or countries primarily allocated to Egypt and Jordan, has a “humanitarian heart” for “shorter or longer periods of time”.
  • Under one leadership and with international funding, Gaza will be rebuilt as the “Riviera of the Middle East”.

In addition to the Gaza vision, Trump has announced that he will issue a statement in March 2025 recognizing Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria. If this happens, it will inspire a force to implement reactions and change the dynamics of the regional conflict.

A game move?

Trump’s vision has shocked the Middle East, his opponents and his domestic allies. The question has not been answered by a tweet but by an idea that he has already presented three times, most recently at an official press conference on February 4, 2024. Thus, and since the world’s most influential political leader is involved, the proposal should be taken very seriously. Since it also concerns Donald Trump, there will also be different perspectives on this.

  • Firstly, it may partly be a domestic political tactic with a wild idea to divert journalists and the public from other, perhaps more prosaic, disputes.
  • Secondly, it may be a negotiation opening to maximize, in order to finally force the other parties involved, after decades of fruitless negotiations, condemnatory high-flying resolutions and general inquisitorial efforts, to take a position on a concrete model that can also be implemented without the participation of the other parties involved.
  • Thirdly, it may be a so-called “mad man’s” tactic – which has been used by, for example, President Putin – when the absence of a presenter creates uncertainty among the interlocutors about this real solution.

Israel Already Acting on Trump’s Vision

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz on Thursday ordered the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to prepare a plan “to allow the voluntary departure of Gaza residents”… “I am preparing President Trump for a bold initiative that would allow a large portion of the Gaza population to move under a different agreement,” according to a Defense Ministry statement. Katz said Trump’s plan “will take several years, during which time Palestinians will be integrated into host countries while facilitating long-term reconstruction efforts in a demilitarized and [neighboring] Gaza free of threats in the post-Hamas era.”

According to Katz, countries such as Spain, Ireland and Norway, which have all accused Israel of violating international law during its war in Gaza, would be “legally obligated to accept any Gazans who arrange to enter their territory.”

Gazans’ willingness to leave

According to the propaganda of Palestinian figures and al-Jazeera (Hamas), Gazans do not want to leave anywhere. However, in addition to the elite who have left, there is also a desire to leave among ordinary Gazans.

In 2015, Fatah personnel claimed that over 90 percent of Gazans wanted to leave because of the Hamas regime. Recent surveys show that there is a reason for the desire to leave among Gazans. According to a 2023 survey by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Research (PSR) (conducted from September 28 to October 8, 2023), 31% of Gazans expressed a desire to emigrate from abroad, and nearly half (44%) of 18-29 year-olds were considering emigrating. The most desired destination was Turkey, followed by Germany, Canada, the United States and Qatar.

Poll info from Palestinian pollster @KShikaki
Poll info from Palestinian pollster @KShikaki
Poll info from Palestinian pollster @KShikaki

Dr. Mohimer Abu-Saada, a political scientist who left Gaza during the war and now lives with his family in Cairo, said: “Gaza is now a place where you can only leave. Most of the residents of the strip have become refugees, and there is no infrastructure in Gaza.”

“Before October 7, fleeing Gaza was the most popular dream for Palestinians. The atmosphere, especially among the youth, was one of complete despair, and this may have been one of the reasons why Hamas started the war – to save itself from civil unrest,” said S., a Gazan media figure who fled to Egypt with his family during the war, according to Ynetnews.

According to UN sources, around 133,000 people, about 7% of Gaza’s population, left between 7 October 2023 and 6 May 2024, when the IDF took control of the Rafah crossing. Before the IDF took control of the crossing, a smuggling industry flourished in Rafah, with wealthier Gazans bribed their way into Egypt. After that, movement across the Gaza-Egypt border for Gazans virtually stopped. Before this, the price of a permit ranged from $6,000 to $12,000 per person, allowing the wealthy to establish a community of around 100,000 Gazans in Cairo and join the tens of thousands who lived in the city before the war.

According to the Palestinian Authority, 860,000 people have left Gaza since Hamas took control in 2007. Evidence of this trend was seen last September, a month before the war, when chaos erupted in Gaza as thousands of Gazans crowded into the “Passi” travel agency, which issued visas to Turkey. The 18,000 permits issued were barely enough to meet the enormous demand.

My assessment

I personally welcome Trump’s vision for two reasons. First, it completely re-arranges the geopolitical playing field, at least in the Middle East, by bringing a concrete, viable proposition to the table instead of aimless whining. Second, the proposal, at its best, could implement what I consider to be the most pragmatic Middle East peace-loving Sinai and Jordanian options for the long-term establishment of a Palestinian state or Palestinian autonomy while meeting Israel’s security needs.

Currently, almost everyone other than the White House and Israel (according to opinion polls, 82 percent of Israeli Jews support “encouraging immigration” of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip) opposes Trump’s vision, especially when it comes to “population transfer.” For example, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas has suggested that some Gazans be relocated to the West Bank on condition that a new Palestinian city be built for them. The area west of Jericho has been identified as a possible location for this development.

According to the UN, direct infrastructure damage is $18.5 billion, and the cost of clearing the rubble alone is estimated at $1.2 billion. The total cost of rebuilding Gaza is estimated at $40 billion, and could extend to 2040 or beyond. Trump’s previous “deal of the century” includes, among other things, the reconstruction of Gaza, the construction of an airport and a designated port in El Arish, and a large industrial park in Sinai. Trump’s latest proposal – apart from the refugee resettlement – ​​is seen in Egypt as a sign that the US president is committed to rebuilding Gaza. (Deal of the Century Finally Announced! [Op-Ed])

Understandably, both Egypt and Jordan have serious security concerns about millions of Palestinians being resettled in their territories. These concerns can be overcome by defining for the Palestinians their own demarcated and controlled areas where new camps or cities are located. After a de-radicalization program and the development of social structures, these areas could then, if they so wish, become independent or, for example, form a confederation with host states.

As Trump’s vision is implemented, well-meaning Palestinian advocates may have to consider whether they want to keep people trapped in a devastated enclave for perhaps a decade simply to avoid accusations of ethnic cleansing.

Palestinians return home to Gaza City on February 2, 2025. Approximately 90% of Gaza residents were displaced during the Israel-Hamas war, according to the UN. Credit: Ali Jadallah/Anadolu/Getty Images

My previous article on the subject: Trump’s pragmatic vision for Gaza

Sources include The Washington Post, Jerusalem PostCNNYnetnews


This article first appeared in the online publication Ariel-Israelista suomeksi